How Mansion Group Built a Fortress Across Borders?

In the world of online gambling, offshore is not an address. It's a defence strategy.

Mansion Group’s corporate structure spans Gibraltar, the British Virgin Islands (BVI), Curaçao and Malta. On paper, these jurisdictions appear disconnected. In practice, they function as a single, protected ecosystem.

This Introduction sets the stage for a 7-part investigative series into how Mansion Group has used fragmented ownership, jurisdictional layering and legal compartmentalisation to create a structure that is difficult to trace, yet operationally aligned.

At first sight, the companies and foundations registered across these jurisdictions may appear disjointed. Differing directors, varied ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) declarations and multiple licensing authorities contribute to a perception of decentralisation. However, when analysed through patterns of service provision, account authorisations and director appointments, indications of a more coordinated structure become apparent.

Our investigation draws from internal documents, official registries and publicly accessible corporate filings. The aim is not to suggest illegality, but to raise legitimate questions about a corporate framework that appears designed to resist external scrutiny.

Upcoming parts of this series:

Part 1: Gibraltar – The Public Face with Private Shields Focuses on Mansion (Gibraltar) Ltd, Apollo Online Consultancy Ltd and Convertonet Ltd. Examines the regulatory climate under the Gibraltar Gambling Division and the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission (GFSC). Highlights the legal and political roles of Albert Isola and Peter Isola of ISOLAS LLP and the oversight practices of Andrew Lyman, Gibraltar’s Gambling Commissioner.

Part 2: BVI – Where Transparency Ends and Ownership Hides Explores the structural function of Violet Star Group Ltd and the jurisdictional advantages of the BVI. Profiles Guy Gussarsky and Andrew Tait, whose names appear in various filings across jurisdictions. Assesses how BVI’s restricted-access UBO registry and nominee-friendly laws facilitate insulation and limit third-party insight into control.

Part 3: Curaçao – Licensing Without Borders Analyses the operation of Midas Entertainment B.V. within Curaçao’s licensing regime. Introduces Herman Behr TEP, Elaine Behr and Steve Croes of the HBM Group and examines the Curaçao Gaming Authority’s evolving, but still opaque, regulatory environment. Evaluates concerns raised in relation to AML compliance, sub-licensing practices and international cooperation.

Part 4: Malta – Foundations, Final Stops and the Sampoerna Silence Details the role of Maltese private foundations, including Midas Touch Private Foundation and La Valette PF. Investigates their administrative structure and links to the Sampoerna Family: Kathleen, Putera and Michael Sampoerna. Reviews Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) records and foundation laws that allow asset control without full public beneficiary disclosure.

Part 5: Who Really Controls What? A Map of People and Power Builds a functional map of recurring actors across the structure, including Gussarsky, Tait, the Behr family and Croes. Introduces other enablers such as Roger Chye, Lawrence Quahe, PO Mak and Donald Chia. Highlights overlaps in appointments, banking access and documentation roles across legal entities.

Part 6: Mapping a Multi-Jurisdictional Ecosystem Synthesises findings from all four jurisdictions to show how decentralised registration masks functional unity. Highlights five structural patterns: fragmented but coordinated operations, strategic jurisdictional roles, concentrated control among individuals, the enabling role of professional advisers and a disconnect between legal form and regulatory function.

Part 7: Conclusion – Legal Structures, Practical Challenges Draws together the implications of the observed model. Addresses the limitations of current cross-border regulation, the gaps in AML enforcement and the risks posed by lawful structures designed to avoid scrutiny. Reaffirms that no wrongdoing is alleged, but underscores the public interest in increased oversight and structural transparency.

To request the full investigative PDF, email info@malta-media.com or message us directly. To support this work, we continue to invite confidential submissions through our encrypted reporting portal. Individuals with information relevant to this investigation (or others involving the online gambling industry) can contact us securely and anonymously via: https://malta-media.com/whistleblower/

FAQs

What is the main focus of this investigation?
The investigation explores how Mansion Group uses fragmented ownership, jurisdictional layering, and legal compartmentalization to create a structure that resists external scrutiny.

What jurisdictions are involved in Mansion Group's corporate structure?
Mansion Group’s corporate structure spans Gibraltar, the British Virgin Islands (BVI), Curaçao, and Malta.

How does the article describe Mansion Group's operational structure?
The article suggests that, while the companies appear disjointed, patterns of service provision and director appointments indicate a more coordinated structure than it first seems.

What is the purpose of this investigation?
The purpose is to raise legitimate questions about Mansion Group's corporate framework, which may be designed to avoid external scrutiny, though no illegality is suggested.

What are the key elements explored in Part 1 of the series?
Part 1 focuses on Mansion (Gibraltar) Ltd, Apollo Online Consultancy Ltd, and Convertonet Ltd, examining Gibraltar’s regulatory climate and the roles of Albert and Peter Isola.

How does the BVI contribute to Mansion Group's structure?
The BVI offers restricted access to UBO (ultimate beneficial owner) registries and nominee-friendly laws, allowing for insulation and limiting insight into ownership.

What role does Curaçao play in Mansion Group’s operations?
Curaçao’s licensing regime is analyzed, particularly the operations of Midas Entertainment B.V., with concerns raised about AML compliance and sub-licensing practices.

How do Maltese foundations factor into the group’s structure?
Maltese private foundations like Midas Touch and La Valette PF allow for asset control without full public beneficiary disclosure, with connections to the Sampoerna family.

Who are some of the recurring actors across Mansion Group’s corporate structure?
Notable figures include Guy Gussarsky, Andrew Tait, the Behr family, and other enablers such as Roger Chye and Donald Chia, whose names appear across different jurisdictions.

What are the key conclusions drawn in Part 7 of the investigation?
The investigation concludes that cross-border regulation has limitations, and the risks posed by lawful structures designed to avoid scrutiny highlight the need for increased oversight and transparency.