Inside the private foundations: Midas Touch and La Valette

There is something about the word “foundation” that tends to make people think of charity, education or family legacies. In the corporate offshore world, though, foundations often play a very different role.

In our latest investigations over the last few weeks, we took a closer look at Midas Touch Foundation and La Valette Foundation, two private structures tied to the Mansion Group universe and how they quietly helped shield income away from regulated oversight.

The invisible barrier between profit and transparency

The use of private foundations (PFs) has been one of the smartest yet most opaque tools in offshore structuring.

Foundations like Midas Touch and La Valette did not run businesses in the traditional sense. Instead, they acted more like silent collectors, sitting at the end of a long paper trail of contracts and invoices.

By routing income through foundations, operators could create distance between the cash flow and the people ultimately benefiting from it. Legal ownership would technically rest with the foundation itself, not the individuals behind it. This layer made it far more difficult for creditors, regulators or courts to trace or freeze funds.

In our experience, the more elaborate the paperwork, the more deliberate the design usually is.

The critical role of HBM Nominees

One name that appears again and again in the structure is @HBM Nominees Limited. This service provider, commonly used in Maltese corporate setups, acted as a crucial intermediary. Their role was to facilitate the routing of fees, dividends and administrative flows from operational companies into the private foundations without drawing unnecessary attention.

Foundations are often viewed by service providers like CSB Group and FinanceMalta as benign tools for asset protection. While that can be true in theory, in practice these entities have often been used to mask the flow of commercial revenue rather than personal inheritance planning.

Why private foundations are getting renewed attention

I remember the first time I reviewed a foundation deed in a similar case years ago. The wording was so carefully constructed that it took three full reads to realise what was actually happening.

Today, foundations like Midas Touch and La Valette are coming under fresh scrutiny from regulators and investigative journalists alike. Questions are being raised about the real purpose of these setups and whether they were ever intended to serve a lawful protective function or simply to create legal distance between profit and accountability.

The reality is that when money moves into foundations under the cloak of asset management or ‘reinvestment strategy,’ it often disappears from public view altogether. This is not just a technicality. It impacts transparency, taxation and financial justice on a global scale.

In our opinion, regulators such as Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) would be well advised to revisit how private foundations are used within structures like these, especially where significant commercial income is involved.

Legal Disclaimer and Ongoing Investigations

As with all editorial content published by Malta-Media, no allegation of unlawful conduct is made against any individual or entity referenced herein. The information presented is derived from publicly accessible registries, corporate databases, internal documentation and confidential submissions believed to be accurate and reliable at the time of publication. Interpretations, where offered, reflect the editorial team’s understanding of jurisdictional structures and regulatory environments and are not intended to imply misconduct or unlawful intent.

This article forms part of an ongoing investigative series examining the legal, financial and operational structures within the online gambling sector. The aim is to contribute to public understanding by outlining governance models, licensing regimes and cross-border frameworks. Malta-Media acknowledges the complexity of these issues and welcomes clarifications or formal responses from any individuals or organisations named. Substantiated responses will be published in full, unedited and with equal prominence.

We continue to invite confidential submissions through our encrypted reporting platform. Individuals with information relevant to this or related investigations may contact us securely and anonymously via our whistleblower form.

FAQs

What is the role of private foundations in offshore finance?
Private foundations often serve as vehicles to obscure ownership and shield income, distancing funds from individuals behind them.

How are foundations like Midas Touch and La Valette used?
They act as financial endpoints in a structured web, routing commercial income through legal layers to reduce oversight and traceability.

Are private foundations inherently illegal?
No, foundations can serve lawful purposes like asset protection, but they are sometimes misused to evade regulation and scrutiny.

What is the connection between these foundations and Mansion Group?
Both Midas Touch and La Valette are linked to the Mansion Group's business ecosystem, helping funnel revenue discreetly.

Who is HBM Nominees and what is their role?
HBM Nominees Limited is a Maltese intermediary that facilitated financial transfers to foundations while avoiding regulatory red flags.

Why are regulators focusing on private foundations now?
Increased scrutiny arises from concerns that foundations are being exploited to obscure taxable income and avoid financial accountability.

What makes private foundations difficult to investigate?
Their legal structure detaches individual ownership, creating layers of separation that hinder tracking by courts or authorities.

Are service providers aware of how these foundations operate?
Some providers promote foundations as asset protection tools, though in practice they often enable commercial revenue masking.

How does this affect financial transparency globally?
These opaque structures can undermine taxation systems, financial justice, and international regulatory efforts.

Is this article making legal accusations?
No. The investigation presents publicly sourced and editorially interpreted data without alleging unlawful conduct.